hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Plato (Colombia) 66 0 Browse Search
Meno (Oklahoma, United States) 56 0 Browse Search
Iliad (Montana, United States) 40 0 Browse Search
Meno (New York, United States) 38 0 Browse Search
Phil (Kentucky, United States) 34 0 Browse Search
Lucian (Arkansas, United States) 22 0 Browse Search
Phil (North Carolina, United States) 22 0 Browse Search
Ruskin (Canada) 18 0 Browse Search
Phil (Nevada, United States) 18 0 Browse Search
Athens (Greece) 16 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Plato, Republic. Search the whole document.

Found 7 total hits in 3 results.

Plato (Colombia) (search for this): book 4, section 433e
you will be convinced. Will you not assign the conduct of lawsuits in your state to the rulers?” “Of course.” “Will not this be the chief aim of their decisions, that no one shall have what belongs to othersTA)LLO/TRIA: the article is normal; Stallb. on Phaedrus 230 A. For the ambiguity of TA)LLO/TRIA cf. 443 D. So OI)KEI/OU is one's own in either literal or the ideal sense of the Stoics and Emerson, and E(AUTOU= is similarly ambiguous. Cf. on 443 D. or be deprived of his own? Nothing else but this.” “On the assumption that this is just?” “Yes.” “From this point of view too, then, the havingE(/CIS is still fluid in Plato and has not yet taken the technical Aristotelian meaning of habit or state. and doing
Emerson (Canada) (search for this): book 4, section 433e
you will be convinced. Will you not assign the conduct of lawsuits in your state to the rulers?” “Of course.” “Will not this be the chief aim of their decisions, that no one shall have what belongs to othersTA)LLO/TRIA: the article is normal; Stallb. on Phaedrus 230 A. For the ambiguity of TA)LLO/TRIA cf. 443 D. So OI)KEI/OU is one's own in either literal or the ideal sense of the Stoics and Emerson, and E(AUTOU= is similarly ambiguous. Cf. on 443 D. or be deprived of his own? Nothing else but this.” “On the assumption that this is just?” “Yes.” “From this point of view too, then, the havingE(/CIS is still fluid in Plato and has not yet taken the technical Aristotelian meaning of habit or state. and doing
1366 AD (search for this): book 4, section 433e
the virtue of state?” “By all means.” “Consider it in this wise tooSo Phaedo 79 EO(/RA DH\ KAI\ TH=|DE. It introduces a further confirmation. The mere judicial and conventional conception of justice can be brought under the formula in a fashion (PH|), for legal justice “est constans et perpetua voluntas ius suum cuique tribuens.” Cf. 331 E and Aristotle Rhet. 1366 b 9E)/STI DE\ DIKAIOSU/NH ME\N A)RETH\ DI' H(\N TA\ AU(TW=N E(/KASTA E)/XOUSI, KAI\ W(S O( NO/MOS. if so you will be convinced. Will you not assign the conduct of lawsuits in your state to the rulers?” “Of course.” “Will not this be the chief aim of their decisions, that no one shall have what belongs to othersTA)LLO/TRIA: the