Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 5
D. Spillan, A.M., M.D., Ed.

1. PEACE being established in every other quarter, the Romans and Veientians were still in arms with such rancour and animosity, that it was evident that ruin awaited the vanquished party. The elections in the two states were conducted in very different methods. [2] The Romans augmented the number of military tribunes with consular power. Eight, a number greater than on any previous occasion, were appointed, Manius Aemilius Mamercinus a second time, Lucius Valerius Potitus a third time, Appius Claudius Crassus, Marcus Quintilius Varus, Lucius Julius Iulus, Marcus Postumius, Marcus Furius Camillus, Marcus Postumius Albinus. The Veientians, on the contrary, through disgust at the annual intriguing which was sometimes the cause of dissensions, elected a king. [3] That step gave offence to the feelings of the states of Etruria, not more from their hatred of kingly government than of the [p. 323]king himself. [4] He had before this become obnoxious to the nation by reason of his wealth and arrogance, because he had violently broken off the performance of some annual games, the omission of which was deemed an impiety: [5] when through resentment of a repulse, because another had been preferred to him as a priest by the suffrages of the twelve states, he suddenly carried off, in the middle of the performance, the performers, of whom a great part were his own slaves. [6] The nation, therefore, devoted beyond all others to religious performances, because they excelled in the method of conducting them, passed a decree that aid should be refused to the Veientians, as long as they should be subject to a king. [7] All allusion to this decree was suppressed at Veii through fear of the king, who would have considered the person by whom any such matter might be mentioned as a leader of sedition, not as the author of an idle rumour. [8] Although matters were announced to the Romans as being quiet in Etruria, yet because it was stayed that this matter was being agitated in all their meetings, they so managed their fortifications, that there should be security on both sides; [9] some were directed towards the city and the sallies of the townsmen; by means of others a front looting towards Etruria was opposed to such auxiliaries as might happen to come from thence.