The sketch here given for the treatment of the accusative constructions
suggests the way in which any set of constructions should be managed.
I append a few specimens of the results for this and that class of words
in a number of cases. I grant that the enumeration for the ablative,
and even for the genitive, is of provoking sweep; but this is only
equivalent to saying that the number of meanings of the ablative and genitive
cases which a young student must learn, under whatsoever method, is great.
The genitive of any pronoun may be found to mean the possessor
of some thing or of some activity (the activity being expressed in a verbal
noun), or the object of some activity (expressed in a noun, an adjective,
or some one of a certain list of verbs), or the whole of which some
other word expresses a part, — may be, then, either subjective,
or objective, or partitive; or it may simply belong
to some noun, just as an adjective does. The genitive of any noun
(say civitatis) may prove to be either subjective, or objective,
or partitive, or in apposition with some other genitive.
The genitive of a noun like periculi may prove to be either appositive,
or subjective, or objective, or partitive, or (if
modified by a noun or participle) qualitative. The genitive
of a noun indicating an act or mental state of a bad nature may
be either appositive, or subjective, or objective,
including a crime charged or a penalty adjudged, or may be
partitive. A genitive magni may agree with a noun,
or may mean the value of something.
The dative of any word may mean the person or thing indirectly concerned
in an act or state expressed by a noun or an adjective or a group of
words. The dative of the name of a person (say Caesari) may
have this general meaning, or, in one or another special phase of it, may
mean the person concerned in an obligation indicated by a gerundive
(the agent), or the possessor of something. The dative of
a word like dolori, laudi, etc., may mean, in a general way,
the thing indirectly concerned, or, with a special phase of that
idea, may mean the end served.
The accusative we have discussed already. The vocative takes care
of itself, when the form is unmistakable.
The ablative is a case to be dreaded.
In general, it should, like other cases, be cut up as little as possible.
Something can be done by proceeding from the three ideas of the starting-point,
the means, and the place (true ablative, instrumental,
and locative), as in Dr. Leighton's table on p. 290, and the table
on p. 254 of the Allen & Greenough Grammar; but the best
intentions on the part of grammarians and teachers have not yet made the
matter easy for the learner. The suggestions to be given here must
go beyond these three divisions.
Nearly all ablatives can be absolute, or can depend upon a
comparative, or on a word like dignus or contentus.
Beside this, a proper name (say Caesare) may be in the ablative
of source, after some word like genitus, though such a form of expression
is naturally rare in the prose read before going to college. Of course
such a word cannot be in the ablative of means (in the narrower
sense), or of specification, or of time, or of degree
of difference. A word like die, however, beside the general
possibilities, may indicate time, or the degree of difference,
a word like auro means or price, a word like capite
description, etc. I shall not attempt here a complete list
of suggestions. In general, in spite of the complexity of the uses
of the ablative, the learner is less likely to go badly astray in dealing
with this case in actual practice than in dealing with the genitive or
the accusative.
One point not yet touched upon is of the gravest consequence.
when a form occurs which may be in either of two cases, or even possibly
in any one of three or four cases, the pupil should
not allow himself to suppose that he knows the case, even if a probability
presents itself at once. E.g., a student reading in B.G.1.3, and
passing by ea (his rebus adducti et auctoritate Orgetorigis permoti
constituerunt ea, quae, etc.), may easily suppose ea to be the
object of constituerunt, instead of waiting until conviction of
some kind is forced upon him by the remainder of the sentence; which
conviction will prove to be that ea was the object, not of constituerunt,
but of an infinitive which is not reached until the quae-clause
is finished. The direction to the student should be: Have
your eyes open, but keep in doubt as long as possible; in a word,
THINK, and WAIT.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.