[32]
for, if that addition had not been made, and if you had chosen to urge, in
your defence, that your household had not done this, you would have gained your cause if you
had been able to prove this. Now, whether you had chosen to use that defence, or this one
which you are using, you must inevitably be convicted; unless we think that a man is brought
before the court who has formed a plan, but that one who has actually done an action is not;
since a design may be supposed to exist without any act being done, but an act cannot exist
without a design. Or, because the act is such that it could not be done without a secret
design, without the aid of the darkness of night, without violence, without injury to another,
without arms, without murder, without wickedness, is it on that account to be decided to have
been done without malice? Or, will you suppose that the pleading has been rendered more
difficult for me in the very case in which the praetor intended that a scandalous plea in
defence should be taken from him?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.