[51]
Is this doubtful, that there is not such an abundance of words,—I
will not say in our language, which is confessedly poor, but not in any other language
either,—as to enable every imaginable thing and circumstance to be expressed by its
own fixed end appropriate name? Is it doubtful that we have no need of words when the matter,
for the sake of which words were first invented, is thoroughly understood? What law, what
resolution of the senate, what edict of a magistrate, what treaty, or covenant, (to return to
men's private affairs,) what will, what judicial decision, what bond, what formula of bargain
or agreement cannot be invalidated and torn to pieces, if we choose to bend facts to words,
and leave out of the question the intention, and design, and authority of those who wrote
them?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.