[53]
In a most elegant and
fluent manner did Lucius Crassus, by far the most eloquent of all men, a little before we came
into the forum, defend this opinion in a trial before the centumviri; 1and with great ease, too, though that very sagacious man,
Quintus Mucius, was arguing against him, did he prove to every one that Marcus Curius, who had
been left a certain person's heir in the case of the death of a posthumous son who was
expected, ought to be the heir, though the son was not dead, never, in fact, having been born.
What? was this case sufficiently provided for by the terms of the will? Certainly not. What
was the thing, then, that influenced the judges? The intention; and if it could be understood
though we were silent, we should not employ words at all: because it could not, words have
been invented, not to hinder people's intentions, but to point them out.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
1 The origin, constitution, and powers of the centumviri are exceedingly obscure; they were judges, but they differed from other judges in being a definite body or collegium. According to Festus three centumviri were chosen out of each tribe, so that their actual number must have been a hundred and five. Their powers were probably limited to Rome, and at all events to Italy. It appears that they had cognisance of both civil and criminal matters. It was the practice to set up a spear in the place where the centumviri were sitting, and accordingly the word hasta or hasta centumviralis, is sometimes used as equivalent to judicium centumvirale. Vide Smith, Dict. Ant. p. 212, v. Centumviri.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.