E. T. Merrill, Commentary on Catullus, Poem 64, line 180

Home Collections/Texts Perseus Catalog Research Grants Open Source About Help

Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:

This text is part of:

Greek and Roman Materials

View text chunked by:

text : poem : line

[180] quemne: = quippe quem; cf. v. 183; Catul. 68.91. The interrogative particle -ne is not infrequently joined to relatives to point the reason for controverting a previous assertion, or for answering in the negative a previous question; cf. Pl. Trin. 360 “quin comedit quod fuit, quod non fuit?” Ter. Phor. 923 “quodne ego discripsi porro illis quibus debui?” and Minton Warren, Amer. Jour. Phil. Vol. 2 p. 50ff.

Catullus. Catullus. E. T. Merrill. Cambridge. Harvard University Press. 1893.

The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar:

E. T. Merrill, Commentary on Catullus
E. T. Merrill, Ed.

This text is part of:

View text chunked by:

Table of Contents:

E. T. Merrill, Commentary on Catullus E. T. Merrill, Ed.

This text is part of:

View text chunked by:

Table of Contents:

E. T. Merrill, Commentary on Catullus
E. T. Merrill, Ed.