previous next

ἐπειδὴ τοίνυν κτλ. See cr. n. The reading in the text has the approval of Schneider and others. It involves less departure from Π and A^{1} than either a ἐπειδὴ τοίνυν κεκριμέναι εἰσίν, ἦν δ᾽ ἐγώ, πάλιν ἀπαιτῶ κτλ. (Hermann), or b ἐπειδὴ τοίνυν, ἦν δ᾽ ἐγώ, κεκριμέναι εἰσίν, ἐγὼ πάλιν (Ast, Stallbaum), or c ἐπειδὴ τοίνυν, ἦν δ᾽ ἐγώ, κεκριμέναι εἰσί, πάλιν ἀπαιτῶ κτλ. (Baiter, J. and C., Burnet). There is no authority for c except a marginal annotation in A, although Burnet erroneously attributes this reading to Vind. F and Stobaeus. See (for Vind. F) Schneider's note and (for Stobaeus) Flor. I p. 402. 22 f. Hense. To a and c it may also be objected that the contrast between Socrates on the one hand, and Glauco and Adimantus on the other, requires the presence of ἐγώ as the subject to ἀπαιτῶ: and in b the jingle ἦν δ᾽ ἐγώἐγὼ πάλιν “valde insuave est” (Schneider).

ἡμᾶς. The reading ὑμᾶς, which Stallbaum adopts, has little authority, and is a needless change, for “Socrates ipse adhuc una cum reliquis iustitiam male audire et deos hominesque secus de ea statuere τοῦ λόγου ἕνεκα posuerat” (Schneider).

δοκεῖσθαι. Cf. VI 490 A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: