previous next

[489] Διόθεν, an assumption explained by the next line. It would seem more natural for Hector to attribute the act to Apollo, after the visible appearance of that god on his behalf (254 ff.; see also 8.311); but since 366, where, as was pointed out, the episode of the “ἀπάτη Διός” properly ends, Apollo has been entirely forgotten, and Zeus, though his actual presence on the field is not mentioned nor perhaps even implied, is the only god who interferes. This is a slight indication of difference of authorship, but, in connexion with others, not insignificant.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (1 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (1):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: