previous next

[674] The epithet δήϊος is applied to fire in the Il. only, five times in the gen., “πυρὸς δηΐοιο”, and four times in nom., “δήϊον πῦρ” always at the end of the line. This suggests that in this sense, consuming, the proper form is “δάϝιος” (“α^”), cf. “θεσπιδαὲς πῦρ”, and Alkman “χεῖμα πῦρ τε δάϝιον”. Schulze (Q. E. p. 86) distinguishes this from the sense hostile (used of war and enemies) where the regular scansion is “δήϊος” (-uu) (7.199, etc.) or “δῆιος” (-u). The latter contracted form is established for H. by the forms of the verb “δηιόειν” (“δηιώσαντες”, etc.), where “ηι” is necessarily monosyllabic and always in arsis. The only passage which seems to be opposed to this complete separation is 2.544 (q.v.), where “δηΐων” in the sense of foemen is apparently scanned uu-. This, however, may only shew that the two words had already been confused when the Catalogue was composed. I have therefore written “δήϊον πῦρ, πυρὸς δηΐοιο”, and “δηΐων” in 2.544, but “δήιους, δήιοισι”, etc., elsewhere.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (2 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (2):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: