previous next

[697] κρινάμενος, selecting; the case is not analogous to the ordinary division of spoil, which is in the hands of the army, not of the king, who is only given a “γέρας ἐξαιρετόν”: here he is exacting payment for a debt. The lengthening of the first “ι” of τριηκόσἰ in thesis is unique and unaccountable. In forms like “ὑπεροπλίηισι” it is explained by metrical necessity (see App. D), which does not exist here; cf. Od. 21.18-19 “μῆλα γὰρ ἐξ Ἰθάκης Μεσσήνιοι ἄνδρες ἄειραν

νηυσὶ πολυκλήϊσι τριηκόσι᾽ ἠδὲ νομῆας”, whence this line seems to have been carelessly copied. The short “ο” before “κρινάμενος” shews that the author of the line was not particularly sensitive to position formed by “ρ”. We may suppose that, relying on forms like “ὑπεροπλίηισι”, he thought that the ‘doubtful’ vowel “ι” could be lengthened at will by an ‘Epic licence’ — but in that case we should have expected to find other similar instances. Or we may emend with Bentley “κρίνας μῆλα τριηκόσἰ”, or with Brandreth “κρινάμενός τε τριηκόσἰ” (comparing “παρά τε κλισίηι καὶ νηῒ μελαίνηι”). It has been suggested that the break in the line at the caesura permitted a short vowel here in place of a long one; but Schulze (Q. E. p. 422) shews that all the cases brought forward by von Christ to prove this are insufficient.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (1 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (1):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: