previous next

[381] This line is omitted by such respectable authorities that it must needs be suspected. it is not absolutely necessary, and may have been interpolated to supply the usual “τόφρα” after “ὄφρα”. If the line originally belonged to this place there is nothing to explain its omission. There appears to be no other case of “ὄφρα”, in the purely temporal sense, succeeded by “δέin apodosi; the only cases in the Il. where it is not answered by “τόφρα” seem to be 61 Il., 442, 5.788, 9.352. But the use follows immediately from the original parataxis; cf. 15.547ὄφρα μὲν” (for a time) . . “αὐτὰρ ἐπεί”.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (3 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (3):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: