previous next

[136] 136-40 are obelized in U (A is defective here, see above). If we suppose with Nicole (Scol. Gen. p. xliv.) that the obeli really refer to 137-41, there is much to be said in favour of the rejection — the reference of “χθιζός” (141), the double mention of the gifts (140, 143), the copying of 137-38, with the repetition “ἀάσθηνἀασάμην”, the contradiction of 139 and 142, all suggest that T was at one time independent of I and that these lines have been added to harmonize them.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: