previous next

[651] Ἐνυαλίωι ἀνδρεϊφόντηι: if this reading is right there is a violent synizesis of “-ωι ἀν-” into one syllable. But we ought to write “ἀδριφόντηι” (or rather “ἀδροφόντηι”), where “ἀδρι-” is a lighter form of “ἀνδρι-”: and so “λιποῦσ᾽ ἀδροτῆτα16.857 (where see note), 22.363, for “ἀνδροτῆτα”, like “α?̓βρότη ἀμφι?́-βροτος”, where the “β” has, like the “δ” of “ἀνδρι”, arisen from the nasal, which then disappeared (H. G. § 370 n.). Similar forms are “α?̓”(“μ”)“πλακήματαAisch. Eum. 934, “ἀνα^”(“μ”)“πλάκητοιSoph. O. T. 472, “”(“μ”)“πλακώνEur. Alc. 242, where also the MSS. mostly give the “μ.” Cf. “ἀδρί: ἀνδρί”, Hesych. In the Cyprian inscriptions the nasal is regularly omitted before a consonant (and so often in mod. Greek, e.g. “ἄθρωπος”).

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (5 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (5):
    • Aeschylus, Eumenides, 934
    • Euripides, Alcestis, 242
    • Homer, Iliad, 16.857
    • Homer, Iliad, 22.363
    • Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus, 472
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: