previous next

[423] “ὡς περισσὸς στίχος ἀθετεῖται. ἐπεί σφι: οὐχ Ὁμηρικῶς κεῖται ἀντωνυμία: διὸ καὶ προηθετεῖτο”, Schol. T. It is clear that Ar. and probably Aph.obelized the line, but the last reason cannot be right, as there is nothing un-Homeric in “σφι”. Objection may be taken to the trochaic caesura, though it falls within the permitted limits (see on 21.575); but it is highly improbable, judging from his silence elsewhere, that Ar. noticed this.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: