previous next

[347] Nikanor says that this line was usually taken with the preceding, so that the infinitives depended upon ἐκέκλετο, and in this some modern editors have acquiesced. But then the transition from the narrative to direct speech is very harsh (see 4.303), and there is no difficulty whatever in making the speech begin as usual immediately after the formal line 346, the infinitives being taken imperatively. Zen. indeed read “ἐπισσεύεσθον”, regarding the dual as equivalent to a plural (1.567). But we ought no doubt to read “ἐπισσεύεσθ᾽, ἐάειν”, with Fick.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (2 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (2):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: