previous next

[660] τεκέων has poor MS. support, but is better than “τοκέων” (recurring only in 21.587) where the short “ε” is the only exception (other than in proper names) to the rule that nouns in -“ευς” have -“η”-: see “τοκήων” in 663 (so Brandreth). Schol. A explaining “ὑπὲρ τοκέων”, says “ἤτοι ὡς λέγομενπρὸς Διός,” ὅπερ ἂν παρόντες ἐποίουν οἱ γονεῖς: ὅπερ μᾶλλον εἰκός: ἐπιφέρει γὰρτῶν ὕπερ ἐνθάδ᾽ ἐγὼ γουνάζομαι”.” But “κτήσιος” in the latter passage (665) proves that “ὑπέρ” cannot = “ἀντί”, and Od. 15.261λίσσομ᾽ ὑπὲρ θυέων καὶ δαίμονος κ.τ.λ.” shews that it is merely the ordinary form of adjuration by an object. So also 22.338, 24.466.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (4 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (4):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: