previous next

[273] For the first κε (here and 8.196) most edd. (including Bekker, Nauck, and Christ) follow H. Voss J. in his conj. “γε”: but the change is needless, as appears from the considerable number of cases of “εἴ κε” with opt. in protasis quoted in H. G. § 313. The separation of “εἰ .. κε” is found again in the same phrase 8.196, and in 23.592; the particles are still far from coalescing into an Attic “ἐάν”. See also M. and T. § 461.

The Iliad, edited, with apparatus criticus, prolegomena, notes, and appendices. Walter Leaf. London. Macmillan. 1900.

The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (2 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (2):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: